Well, except for the bit about being paid to urinate on a young co-star, a feature of a recent movie which just keeps on getting mentioned again and again in the Australian media. Last time I noticed was here, but the story has been around for at least a year.
What's more, the movie itself has long been released in the US and make the staggeringly unimpressive sum of $693,286. This figure is spectacularly low. Have we had to listen to how Nicole didn't worry about really urinating on Zac for a year all in the hope that it can get the movie to crack $1,000,000 internationally?
Or maybe the problem is the movie does not live up to the trash billing. The Age story (my first link) in fact notes:
Of course, you don't really see that happen. You see her face; you hear a splash.So let me get this straight: for some reason of authenticity, or PR purposes, or something, Zac Effron let something most people would call degrading in any situation be done to him for real. And it is not on camera at all? That could have been achieved by a sound effect added later?
Actors must be stupider than I thought....
No comments:
Post a Comment